What Questions Should You Ask Before Buying an IUL for Retirement?
Someone shows you an IUL illustration.
The cash value looks good.
The retirement-income number looks even better.
And you’re thinking:
“Okay. What am I missing?”
That’s a good question.
Because the worst time to learn how your IUL works is 20 years after you bought it.
Before you commit money to an indexed universal life policy for retirement, you should understand what you’re buying, what isn’t guaranteed, what the policy costs, how the loans work, what could cause the strategy to struggle, and what assumptions are producing the retirement-income number you’re being shown.
You don’t need to become an insurance actuary.
But you should be able to ask a few uncomfortable questions.
Here are 25 I would ask.
1. Why Am I Buying an IUL in the First Place?
Start here.
Not with the cap.
Not with the illustrated cash value.
Not with the retirement-income number.
What problem is this policy supposed to solve?
Permanent life insurance?
Another potential retirement-income source?
Legacy planning?
Survivor protection?
Tax-character diversification?
A combination?
If nobody can clearly explain the job the policy is supposed to do in your financial plan, don’t move to Question 2 yet.
2. Do I Actually Have a Permanent Life Insurance Need?
An IUL is life insurance.
That sounds obvious, but it gets forgotten when the conversation turns almost entirely toward retirement income.
Ask why you need permanent death-benefit protection.
Who is being protected?
Your spouse?
Your children?
Your business?
Your estate?
Is there another legitimate insurance need?
The answer matters because you’re not simply opening another retirement account.
You’re purchasing a permanent life insurance contract.
3. How Much Am I Expected to Contribute, and for How Long?
Don’t settle for:
“About $10,000 a year.”
Ask for the actual funding plan.
How much in Year 1?
Year 2?
Year 5?
Year 10?
When are client contributions expected to stop?
What happens if you retire early?
What happens if your income falls?
A long-term strategy should be built around a contribution level you can realistically maintain.
4. What Happens If I Stop Funding the Policy Earlier Than Planned?
This is one of the questions people avoid because they assume their financial life won’t change.
It probably will.
You could lose a job.
Sell a business.
Retire early.
Have a major health expense.
Need to help a family member.
Ask to see what happens if your planned funding period gets cut short.
Not theoretically.
On the numbers.
5. How Much Cash Should I Keep Outside the IUL?
If funding the policy leaves you short on accessible cash, that’s a problem.
You still need money for:
- Emergencies
- Near-term expenses
- Debt payments
- Home repairs
- Healthcare
- Unexpected family expenses
An IUL is a long-term insurance contract.
Don’t put yourself in a position where every unexpected bill requires you to disturb the policy.
6. What Are All the Charges Inside This Policy?
Ask for more than:
“The policy has low fees.”
What are the actual charges?
Depending on the contract, charges can include items such as cost of insurance, administrative charges, premium-related charges, rider charges, surrender charges, and other contractual expenses.
Then ask:
“Show me where I can see those charges in the illustration.”
You don’t need a slogan.
You need numbers.
7. How Does Cost of Insurance Change as I Get Older?
This matters if you’re buying the policy for retirement.
You might own it for 30, 40, or 50 years.
The applicable cost-of-insurance rate can increase with attained age, subject to the policy’s contractual provisions.
Ask what the projected dollar charges look like later in life.
Age 75.
Age 85.
Age 95.
The retirement strategy needs to survive the years when you’re actually retired.
8. What Is Guaranteed and What Is Not Guaranteed?
This should be one of the simplest questions you ask.
Point at the illustration and ask:
“Which of these numbers are guaranteed?”
Then:
“Which aren’t?”
Don’t let the visual presentation blur the difference.
Nonguaranteed illustrated values are projections.
They can change.
9. What Indexed-Crediting Assumption Is Being Used?
If the illustration uses a particular nonguaranteed indexed-crediting assumption, ask why.
What produces that assumption?
How does it compare with a lower assumption?
What happens if actual indexed crediting is weaker?
Don’t ask only what the illustrated rate is.
Ask what happens when you lower it.
10. Is My Money Actually Invested in the S&P 500?
No, not through the indexed account.
Indexed universal life isn’t direct ownership of the S&P 500.
You don’t own the stocks in the index through the indexed account.
The policy uses an applicable index as part of the formula for determining indexed interest under the contract.
That’s very different from directly owning an S&P 500 index fund.
If someone talks about IUL crediting and stock-market returns as though they’re the same thing, ask them to explain the difference.
11. Does the Historical Example Include S&P 500 Dividends?
This is especially important when you’re shown historical calculations.
One historical analysis used in our JUMP modeling examines annual S&P 500 price changes from 2006 through 2020, excluding dividends.
It applies a:
10% cap
and:
0% indexed-crediting floor.
Negative annual price changes are replaced with 0% for purposes of that historical indexed-crediting calculation.
Positive annual price changes above 10% are capped at 10%.
The resulting annual capped-and-floored figures average approximately:
6.87%.
That 6.87% is not the historical total return of the S&P 500.
It isn’t a guaranteed future policy return.
It’s the historical average credited result from that specific capped-and-floored analysis.
12. What Happens If the Policy Credits 0%?
Don’t just ask what the 0% floor does.
Ask what it doesn’t do.
A 0% indexed-crediting result does not necessarily mean the total policy value stays flat.
Policy charges can continue.
Loan costs can continue.
Retirement distributions can continue.
Ask:
“Show me what happens to the actual policy values during several weak crediting years.”
13. Can the Cap, Participation Rate, Spread, or Other Crediting Terms Change?
Ask which applicable terms are contractually guaranteed and which may change where permitted under the contract.
Then ask what the illustration looks like under less favorable assumptions.
A retirement strategy can last decades.
You want to understand the range of contractual possibilities, not just today’s terms.
14. Exactly How Do the Policy Loans Work?
This is a big one.
If policy loans are central to the retirement strategy, you should understand:
- What type of loan is being used
- How the applicable loan rate is determined
- Whether the rate can change
- How outstanding indebtedness affects policy values
- How loans affect death benefit
- How loans can affect lapse risk
Don’t accept:
“You just borrow your own money tax-free.”
That’s too simple.
Policy loans create real policy indebtedness.
15. What Is the Current Loan Rate, and What’s the Maximum?
With the policy structure we currently use for the IUL JUMP Strategy, the applicable loan rate is currently:
5%.
The applicable loan feature has a contractual maximum loan rate of:
6%.
Those are two different numbers.
I would ask to see the strategy at both.
Don’t assume the current 5% applicable rate remains there forever.
16. What Happens If My Indexed Crediting Is Lower Than My Loan Cost?
This is the question behind negative arbitrage.
Suppose applicable indexed crediting is:
0%.
And the applicable policy-loan cost is:
5%.
The simplified economic relationship is:
0% – 5% = an unfavorable 5-percentage-point spread.
Now ask:
“What happens if that occurs while I’m also taking retirement income?”
That’s much more useful than seeing only a favorable arbitrage example.
17. If You’re Showing Me Positive Arbitrage, Is It Guaranteed?
No.
Using the historical/modeling example discussed earlier:
6.87% – 5.00% = 1.87 percentage points.
That’s the simplified favorable spread between the historical capped-and-floored credited result used in that model and the current applicable loan rate.
It isn’t a guaranteed spread.
It isn’t a guaranteed policy return.
It isn’t guaranteed profit.
If someone shows you positive arbitrage, ask to see negative arbitrage right next to it.
18. Where Does the Extra Money in the JUMP Strategy Actually Come From?
This question matters because the word “matching” can create the wrong impression.
Take the standard $10,000 annual contribution example.
| Policy Year | Client Contribution | Matching Indexed Participating Loan | Total Annual Funding Shown |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | $10,000 | $0 | $10,000 |
| 2 | $10,000 | $0 | $10,000 |
| 3 | $10,000 | $10,000 | $20,000 |
| 4 | $10,000 | $10,000 | $20,000 |
| 5 | $10,000 | $20,000 | $30,000 |
| 6 | $10,000 | $20,000 | $30,000 |
| 7 | $10,000 | $30,000 | $40,000 |
| 8 | $10,000 | $30,000 | $40,000 |
| 9 | $10,000 | $40,000 | $50,000 |
| 10 | $10,000 | $40,000 | $50,000 |
| 11 | $10,000 | $50,000 | $60,000 |
In Year 11, the client is not writing a $60,000 check.
The client is contributing $10,000 in this example.
The additional $50,000 shown comes from Matching Indexed Participating Loan activity.
That additional amount is policy-loan-funded money.
It is not a free carrier contribution.
It is not a bonus.
It is not an employer match.
It is not a tax credit.
Under the strategy mechanics being modeled, those loan proceeds are redeployed into the same policy as additional funding.
19. Do Those JUMP Loans Disappear When the Next JUMP Happens?
No.
Under the mechanics being modeled, later JUMP activity doesn’t simply erase earlier outstanding loans.
The loans accumulate.
That’s why you should ask to see:
- Total policy value
- Total outstanding indebtedness
- Applicable loan charges
- Projected net death benefit
Ask for the whole picture.
20. Are My Future JUMPs Guaranteed Today?
No.
This question should be asked before buying the policy.
The standard JUMP example shows planned increases in policy Years:
3, 5, 7, 9 and 11.
Each planned JUMP requires a new application and approval for the applicable death-benefit increase.
Future approval is not guaranteed by initial policy approval.
Factors can include:
- Health
- Income
- Employment
- Existing insurance
- Driving history
- Occupation
- Hazardous job duties
- Risky hobbies
- Other applicable underwriting considerations
So ask:
“Show me the retirement projection if I never qualify for another JUMP.”
That’s a very important number.
21. What Happens If I Don’t Qualify for My Next JUMP?
Under the mechanics we’re discussing, a missed JUMP can pause the progression rather than automatically resetting the previously achieved strategy.
You may remain at the previously achieved matching-loan level and may be able to reapply at a later policy anniversary if circumstances improve, subject to applicable rules and approval.
But don’t just ask what happens administratively.
Ask:
“What happens to my projected retirement income?”
That’s the part you actually care about.
22. How Much Retirement Income Is the Policy Showing, and What Has to Go Right for Me to Get It?
This might be my favorite question on the list.
Don’t ask only:
“How much can I take?”
Ask:
“What assumptions have to happen for me to take that amount for as long as you’re showing?”
Now you’re talking about:
- Indexed crediting
- Policy charges
- Loan rates
- Loan balances
- Future JUMPs
- Retirement age
- Distribution amounts
- Longevity
That’s the real retirement-income equation.
What About a Modeled 12% Retirement Distribution?
Under modeling used with the IUL JUMP Strategy, we’ve evaluated retirement distributions at approximately 12% per year of policy/account value under specific assumptions.
That is a modeled distribution level.
It is not a universal safe withdrawal rate.
It is not guaranteed lifetime income.
It does not mean every IUL can safely distribute 12% annually.
If you’re shown that level of modeled income, ask:
“Show me the policy at age 85, 90, 95 and 100 while taking it.”
23. What Happens If I Live Much Longer Than Expected?
Retirement planning gets uncomfortable when you start asking:
“What if I don’t die when the illustration expects me to?”
But that’s exactly what you should ask.
If you retire at 60 and live to 98, that’s potentially 38 years of retirement.
Ask to see the policy at 95.
Then ask to see 100 where appropriate.
Look at:
- Policy value
- Outstanding indebtedness
- Annual charges
- Retirement distributions
- Projected net death benefit
Don’t let the illustration stop at an age that makes the story convenient.
24. What Happens If the Policy Lapses With a Large Loan?
This is not a fun question.
Ask it anyway.
Policy loans from a properly structured and maintained non-MEC policy may potentially provide access to policy values without current income taxation under current federal rules.
But if a policy with gain and outstanding indebtedness later lapses or is surrendered, taxable income can potentially result under applicable tax rules.
Ask:
“Show me how you’re monitoring lapse risk once retirement loans begin.”
If there isn’t a clear answer, keep asking.
25. Can You Show Me the Same Strategy When the Assumptions Get Worse?
This is the question that ties everything together.
Take the pretty illustration.
Then make it uncomfortable.
Ask for:
- Lower indexed-crediting assumptions
- Several 0% indexed-crediting periods
- The current applicable 5% loan rate
- The contractual maximum 6% loan-rate stress test
- 6% loan cost combined with weaker crediting
- No additional future JUMPs
- Retirement five years early
- Higher retirement distributions
- A large unexpected retirement expense
- Survival to age 95 or beyond
Then ask:
“Do I still like this?”
Bonus Question: Where Did the 300% Number Come From?
If you’re evaluating the IUL JUMP Strategy with us, there’s another question you should absolutely ask.
“You said this has produced up to approximately 300% more projected retirement income in certain comparisons. Show me exactly how.”
Good.
That’s what I want you to ask.
In certain modeled comparisons we’ve evaluated, the IUL JUMP Strategy has produced up to approximately 300% more projected retirement income than the 401(k), Traditional IRA, or comparable tax-deferred retirement strategy being evaluated.
That does not mean 300% more return.
It doesn’t mean 300% more indexed interest.
It doesn’t mean 300% more cash value.
It doesn’t mean every client receives 300% more retirement income.
It is a modeled retirement-income comparison under specific assumptions.
Make Someone Show You Why the Difference Exists
If a comparison produces a dramatic retirement-income difference, break it apart.
How much of the difference is coming from tax treatment?
How much is coming from the distribution structure?
How much is coming from the Matching Indexed Participating Loan mechanics?
How much is coming from the modeled positive-arbitrage effect?
What loan rate is assumed?
What indexed-crediting assumption is used?
What policy charges are being accounted for?
How long does the retirement-income projection run?
What happens if future JUMPs stop?
Show me exactly where the difference comes from.
What About the Approximately 40% Traditional-IUL Comparison?
In certain modeled comparisons we’ve evaluated, the IUL JUMP Strategy has produced approximately 40% more projected retirement income than the traditional IUL structure being compared.
Same rule.
Don’t believe the percentage because it sounds good.
Ask what makes the two designs different.
Compare:
- The same client
- The same client-funded contribution where appropriate
- The death-benefit structure
- Policy charges
- Indexed-crediting assumptions
- Loan mechanics
- Loan costs
- Retirement timing
- Retirement distributions
- Longevity
Then let the numbers answer the question.
Ask About the Modeled 8.74%, 11.61%, 14.48%, and 17.35% Numbers Too
If those numbers appear in a JUMP presentation, ask exactly what they mean.
Under assumptions used in one JUMP analysis, the combination of the base indexed-crediting assumption and the positive-arbitrage effect attributed to successive Matching Indexed Participating Loans produced modeled effective results reaching approximately:
- 8.74% at the Year 3 JUMP
- 11.61% at the Year 5 JUMP
- 14.48% at the Year 7 JUMP
- 17.35% at the Year 9 JUMP
Then ask the follow-up:
“Are those S&P 500 returns?”
No.
“Are they indexed-crediting rates?”
No.
“Are they guaranteed policy returns?”
No.
“Are they guaranteed compound annual growth rates?”
No.
They are modeled effective results under assumptions used in the referenced JUMP analysis, before accounting for applicable policy charges and other factors.
That’s a very different statement.
Ask to See the Debt, Not Just the Cash Value
If policy loans are part of the strategy, I want to see two numbers side by side:
Policy value.
And:
Outstanding policy indebtedness.
Then I want a third:
Projected net death benefit.
Showing only gross policy value can leave out a major part of the retirement story.
Ask What Happens When You Die
You’re buying life insurance.
So ask.
What is the projected gross death benefit?
What is the projected outstanding indebtedness?
What is the projected net death benefit payable to beneficiaries under the assumptions being shown?
Life insurance death benefits are generally received income-tax-free under current federal law, subject to applicable exceptions and individual circumstances.
Outstanding policy indebtedness generally reduces the net death benefit payable under the contract.
Ask Who Is Monitoring the Policy After You Buy It
This question gets overlooked.
You could own this policy for decades.
Who’s reviewing it?
How often?
What gets reviewed?
Actual policy values?
Crediting terms?
Loan balances?
Loan rates?
Death benefit?
Retirement distributions?
Future JUMP eligibility?
An IUL retirement strategy shouldn’t become a document you put in a drawer for 25 years.
Ask What Would Cause the Recommendation to Change
This is another question I like:
“What would you need to see in my numbers to tell me not to do this?”
Maybe your liquidity is too tight.
Maybe the long-term contribution is uncomfortable.
Maybe the insurance need isn’t there.
Maybe the underwriting result changes the economics.
Maybe another strategy fits the specific objective better.
If the answer is somehow always “buy the IUL,” you haven’t learned much from the analysis.
The Question Behind All 25 Questions
Most people aren’t actually worried about understanding every insurance term.
They’re worried about this:
“Am I about to make a decision I’ll regret when it’s too late to fix it?”
That’s the real question.
You spent decades building your money.
Now someone is asking you to commit part of it to a strategy you may use for the next 30 or 40 years.
Of course you want to understand it.
You may be thinking:
“We should be able to handle this ourselves.”
Or:
“What if we mess this up and regret it?”
And later:
“I don’t want to ask my kids for help.”
Those aren’t irrational fears.
They’re reasons to slow down enough to understand the math before committing.
You Should Be Able to Explain the Strategy Back to Someone Else
Here’s a simple test.
After the meeting, could you explain to your spouse:
- Why you’re buying the policy
- How much you’re putting into it
- What the death benefit is doing
- How indexed crediting works
- What the 0% floor does and does not protect
- What the policy costs
- How the policy loans work
- What happens if loan economics turn unfavorable
- What happens if you don’t receive future JUMPs
- How retirement distributions are modeled
- What could cause the policy to struggle
- What happens when you die
If you can’t, you probably have more questions to ask.
What Should You Bring to an IUL Retirement Strategy Meeting?
If you want a useful comparison, bring real numbers.
- Your age
- Your spouse’s age if applicable
- Your expected retirement date
- Current retirement-account balances
- Annual retirement contributions
- Existing life insurance
- Expected pensions
- Social Security estimates
- Approximate retirement-income goal
- Available cash and taxable investments
- Major debts
- Any known large retirement expenses
The better the inputs, the more useful the comparison becomes.
The Bottom Line
Before buying an IUL for retirement, don’t ask only:
“How much retirement income does it show?”
Ask:
“What am I buying?”
“What does it cost?”
“What is guaranteed?”
“What isn’t?”
“How do the loans work?”
“What happens if crediting is weak?”
“What happens if the loan rate reaches 6%?”
“What happens if I don’t qualify for another JUMP?”
“What happens if I retire early?”
“What happens if I live to 100?”
“What happens if the policy lapses?”
And whenever somebody shows you a large projected advantage:
“Show me exactly where the difference comes from.”
That’s the question that keeps the conversation about math instead of hype.
Let the math do the talking.
How We Answer These Questions at FPP Financial
At FPP Financial, we use our Retirement Math Method™.
We don’t start with:
“How do we make this illustration look as big as possible?”
We start with your retirement problem.
Then we test the strategy.
We look at:
- Your actual funding
- Your insurance need
- Your retirement timeline
- Your existing retirement assets
- Your liquidity
- The policy’s charges
- Indexed-crediting assumptions
- Client-funded dollars
- Matching Indexed Participating Loan activity
- The current applicable 5% loan rate
- The contractual maximum 6% loan-rate stress test
- Outstanding policy indebtedness
- Projected net death benefit
- Future JUMP assumptions
- No-future-JUMP scenarios
- Lower crediting
- 0% indexed-crediting periods
- Retirement distributions
- Earlier retirement
- Longer life
Then we compare the strategy with the alternatives you’re actually considering.
We don’t sell you a retirement strategy. We run the math and let you decide.
I don’t try to sell you on the strategy. I make the strategy prove itself with the math.
Want to Put Your Own Numbers Through the Test?
In certain modeled comparisons we’ve evaluated, the IUL JUMP Strategy has produced up to approximately 300% more projected retirement income than the 401(k), Traditional IRA, or comparable tax-deferred retirement strategy being evaluated.
In certain modeled comparisons, it has also produced approximately 40% more projected retirement income than the traditional IUL structure being compared.
Those are modeled results, not guarantees.
And you shouldn’t take our word for the percentage.
Don’t just believe the 300% number. Make the strategy prove where the difference comes from with the math.
The number isn’t the reason to buy it. The assumptions behind the number are what you need to understand.
The 300% isn’t the sales pitch. It’s the question.
Show me exactly where the difference comes from.
Then show me what happens when the assumptions change.
Let the math do the talking.
Schedule Your Tax-Free Retirement Strategy Meeting
Explore More
- What Are the Biggest Risks of Using an IUL for Retirement?
- How to Stress-Test an IUL Before You Use It for Retirement
- How to Read an IUL Illustration Before You Buy a Policy
Disclosure
This material is for educational purposes only and is not intended as individualized investment, securities, tax, legal, accounting, retirement, underwriting, estate-planning, or insurance advice. Indexed universal life insurance is permanent life insurance and is not a qualified retirement plan, IRA, brokerage account, mutual fund, index fund, savings account, annuity, or direct investment in a market index.
Indexed universal life policies contain costs, limitations, risks, and contractual requirements. Suitability and appropriate policy design are determined by individual circumstances, insurance needs, insurability, financial resources, liquidity, objectives, and the terms of the applicable insurance contract.
Projected retirement income, policy values, death benefits, indexed-crediting results, and other nonguaranteed illustrated values are not guaranteed unless specifically identified as guaranteed under the applicable insurance contract. Actual policy performance may differ materially from illustrated results.
A 0% indexed-crediting floor applies to the applicable indexed-crediting calculation under the example discussed and does not guarantee that overall policy value cannot decline. Cost of insurance, administrative expenses, policy-loan costs, withdrawals, distributions, and other policy mechanics can continue to affect policy values during a 0% indexed-crediting period.
Indexed universal life insurance does not directly invest policy cash value in the S&P 500 or another market index and does not provide ownership of underlying index securities through the indexed account. Indexed-crediting results should not be confused with market-index returns or direct investment performance. Dividends from the S&P 500 are not received as they would be through direct ownership of the underlying securities.
Caps, participation rates, spreads, crediting methods, loan rates, and other policy elements may be guaranteed or nonguaranteed as specified by the applicable insurance contract. Nonguaranteed elements may change where permitted by contract. Current approved policy information and the actual insurance contract should be reviewed before purchase.
Policy values from a properly structured and maintained non-MEC life insurance policy may potentially be accessed through withdrawals to basis and policy loans without current income taxation under current federal rules, subject to applicable requirements. Tax treatment can be affected by basis, MEC status, policy lapse, surrender, outstanding indebtedness, and other circumstances.
Policy loans create indebtedness and generally accrue applicable loan charges. Policy loans can reduce policy values and death benefits and can increase lapse risk. A policy that lapses or is surrendered with gain and outstanding indebtedness may create taxable income under applicable tax rules.
Life insurance death benefits are generally received income-tax-free by beneficiaries under current federal law, subject to applicable exceptions and individual circumstances. Outstanding policy indebtedness generally reduces the net death benefit payable under the applicable insurance contract.
Modified Endowment Contract status can materially change the tax treatment of policy distributions. Increasing death benefit does not by itself guarantee that a policy will avoid MEC status. Actual policy design, premium funding, applicable tax rules, underwriting approval, procedures, and contract provisions control.
References to approximately 12% annual retirement distributions describe modeled distribution levels under specific assumptions. They should not be interpreted as universal safe withdrawal rates, guaranteed distribution rates, guaranteed lifetime income, or assurances that an indexed universal life policy can sustain those distribution levels.
Matching Indexed Participating Loans are policy loans. They are not free contributions, employer matches, bonuses, tax credits, guaranteed gains, or direct investments in a market index. Under the strategy described here, Matching Indexed Participating Loan proceeds are modeled as being redeployed into the same policy as additional funding. Associated policy indebtedness and applicable loan costs remain part of the policy economics.
With the policy structure discussed in this article, the applicable loan rate is currently 5%, with a contractual maximum loan rate of 6% for the applicable loan feature. The current applicable rate should not be interpreted as a guarantee that the rate will remain at 5%. Current and maximum loan provisions should be verified against current approved policy information and the actual insurance contract.
Positive arbitrage is not guaranteed. Periods in which applicable indexed crediting is below the applicable policy-loan cost can create unfavorable loan economics. Prolonged unfavorable loan economics combined with policy charges, distributions, and growing indebtedness can place additional pressure on policy values and increase lapse risk.
The historical 6.87% indexed-crediting example discussed in this article is based on an analysis of annual S&P 500 price changes from 2006 through 2020, excluding dividends, and applying the stated 10% cap and 0% indexed-crediting floor. Negative annual price changes were replaced by 0% and positive annual price changes above 10% were capped at 10% for purposes of that historical analysis. The resulting annual capped-and-floored figures averaged approximately 6.87%. Historical results do not predict future policy performance and should not be interpreted as a guaranteed future indexed-crediting rate, compound annual growth rate, net policy return, or historical total return of the S&P 500.
The simplified 1.87-percentage-point modeled positive spread represents the mathematical difference between the 6.87% historical indexed-crediting result used in the referenced model and the current 5% applicable policy-loan rate. It is not a representation of net policy return after cost of insurance, administrative expenses, other policy charges, withdrawals, distributions, or other factors and is not guaranteed to occur.
The modeled effective JUMP results of approximately 8.74%, 11.61%, 14.48%, and 17.35% are not S&P 500 returns, indexed-crediting rates, compound annual growth rates, sustainable withdrawal rates, net returns after policy charges, participation rates, cap rates, or guaranteed policy returns. They are modeled effective results under assumptions used in the referenced JUMP analysis, before accounting for applicable policy charges and other factors.
Future JUMPs and associated death-benefit increases are subject to future underwriting and approval. Initial policy approval and prior successful JUMPs do not guarantee future increases. Health, income, employment, existing insurance, driving history, occupation, hazardous job duties, risky hobbies, and other applicable underwriting factors may affect eligibility for additional coverage.
Death-benefit increases associated with planned JUMPs are designed to create additional funding capacity under the intended policy design while managing applicable MEC limits. Increasing death benefit does not by itself guarantee non-MEC status. Actual policy design, premium funding, tax rules, underwriting approval, applicable procedures, and contract provisions control.
Under the strategy mechanics described, failure to qualify for a future JUMP does not necessarily mean prior successful JUMPs or the previously achieved matching-loan level automatically disappear. Actual policy rules govern each case, and projections should be updated when future JUMP assumptions change.
The up-to-approximately-300% projected retirement-income result cited in this article refers to certain modeled comparisons involving the IUL JUMP Strategy and a 401(k), Traditional IRA, or comparable tax-deferred retirement strategy. It is not a universal result or guarantee and should not be interpreted as 300% more investment return, indexed interest, policy-loan arbitrage, net policy return, sustainable withdrawal rate, guaranteed lifetime income, death benefit, cash value, or S&P 500 performance. Contributions, taxes, retirement timing, indexed-crediting results, policy-loan mechanics, loan rates, policy charges, future JUMPs, distributions, longevity, and other assumptions can materially alter the comparison.
The approximately-40% projected retirement-income result refers to certain modeled comparisons involving the JUMP Strategy and the traditional IUL structure being evaluated. It is not a universal result or guarantee and does not represent approximately 40% more investment return, indexed interest, cash value, or death benefit. Funding, policy charges, crediting assumptions, loan provisions, distributions, future JUMPs, and longevity can materially alter the comparison.
FPP Financial does not provide tax, legal, accounting, investment, securities, or estate-planning advice. Individuals should consult qualified tax, legal, accounting, insurance, financial, estate-planning, and other appropriate professionals regarding their individual circumstances before purchasing or modifying life insurance, taking policy loans, accessing policy values, changing retirement-plan contributions, or implementing any retirement-income or insurance strategy discussed here.







