Roth Conversion at Age 72: Is It Too Late to Convert Your IRA?

You’re 72.

You’ve been retired for a while.

Social Security is coming in.

Medicare is part of life.

Maybe there’s a pension too.

And sitting in the middle of all of it is a traditional IRA that could still be worth $750,000, $1 million, $2 million, or more.

Now you’re asking a question you wish you’d asked ten years ago:

“Is it too late to start converting some of this money to Roth?”

No.

Age 72 by itself doesn’t make Roth conversions unavailable.

But the decision is different now.

At 72, we’re not working with a blank retirement canvas.

Your income streams are probably already running.

Medicare is already part of the equation.

Required minimum distributions may be close or may already apply based on your birth year and current federal rules.

Your time horizon is different.

Your spouse’s future may carry more weight.

Your children may be part of the conversation.

And writing a large tax check at 72 feels very different from writing one at 52.

That doesn’t mean don’t convert. It means the strategy has less room for lazy assumptions.

Quick Answer: Can You Do a Roth Conversion at Age 72?

Yes.

There’s no general rule that says you become too old to complete a Roth conversion at 72.

You can potentially convert eligible traditional retirement assets to Roth.

The taxable portion of the conversion is generally included in income for the year of conversion.

At 72, I want to see how that additional income interacts with:

• Social Security
• Pension income
• Investment income
• Medicare
• Potential IRMAA
• RMD rules
• Retirement spending
• Outside cash
• Your spouse’s retirement picture
• Beneficiary planning
• Charitable goals
• The no-conversion alternative

The fact that you can convert doesn’t tell us whether paying the tax makes sense.

Age 72 Creates a Different Roth Conversion Question

At 60, you might have been asking:

“How much can I convert before retirement?”

At 65:

“How will this affect Medicare?”

At 67:

“What happens now that Social Security has started?”

At 72, another question gets louder:

“What happens if I leave this traditional IRA alone for the rest of my life?”

That’s a different conversation.

Because the money may no longer be primarily for you.

What If I Don’t Need My IRA?

This is where Roth conversion planning can become more interesting at 72.

Imagine you receive:

• $50,000 of Social Security between you and your spouse
• $60,000 pension income
• Additional income from taxable investments

Your lifestyle costs $90,000 per year.

You aren’t relying heavily on your $1.5 million traditional IRA.

So it keeps sitting there.

That’s a good financial position.

But it creates another question.

“If I’m not spending this account, who eventually will?”

Your IRA Can Quietly Change Jobs

When you were 45, the IRA’s job was retirement accumulation.

At 60, its job was retirement security.

At 72, if you don’t need the money, its job may be changing again.

It may now be:

• A future RMD account
• A surviving-spouse asset
• An inheritance for your children
• A charitable asset
• A combination of all four

Once the job changes, the tax strategy may need to change with it.

What About Required Minimum Distributions at Age 72?

This is an area where you don’t want to use an old rule of thumb.

RMD starting ages have changed under federal law, and the applicable starting age can vary based on birth year.

That means being 72 doesn’t automatically tell us whether your RMDs have already begun.

Your actual birth date and applicable current rules need to be checked.

Don’t build a Roth conversion around an outdated RMD age.

Can I Convert My RMD to Roth?

No.

A required minimum distribution isn’t eligible for Roth conversion.

If RMD rules apply to you for the year, the required distribution needs to be handled separately from additional eligible amounts you may want to convert.

For example, imagine you’re subject to an RMD.

You can’t simply label that required distribution a Roth conversion and move it into the Roth.

Additional eligible traditional IRA assets may potentially be converted after applicable distribution requirements are addressed.

RMD and Roth conversion are two separate transactions with different tax rules.

Does That Mean Roth Conversions Are Over Once RMDs Start?

No.

This is another common misunderstanding.

RMDs beginning doesn’t automatically eliminate Roth conversions.

It changes the order and the income picture.

Now you may have:

Social Security.

A pension.

An RMD.

Investment income.

And then a Roth conversion on top.

The conversion can still be available, but you’re stacking it on top of income that’s already there.

Example: Age 72 With a $1.5 Million Traditional IRA

Imagine you’re 72.

You have:

• $1.5 million traditional IRA
• $400,000 cash and taxable investments
• Social Security
• $40,000 pension
• Medicare
• Minimal Roth assets
• $90,000 annual spending goal

You don’t need much from the IRA.

Should you convert $100,000?

I don’t know yet.

And that’s the right answer before we run the comparison.

We could test:

• No conversion
• $25,000 conversion
• $50,000 conversion
• $75,000 conversion
• $100,000 conversion
• $150,000 conversion
• Different amounts in future years

Then make those strategies compete.

Why Would Someone Convert at 72?

There are several reasons the strategy may deserve consideration.

For example:

• Reducing the amount remaining in traditional retirement accounts
• Potentially reducing future RMDs
• Creating more Roth assets for later retirement
• Creating additional tax diversification
• Planning for a surviving spouse
• Planning for children or other beneficiaries
• Managing future taxable income

But none of those reasons automatically proves the conversion is worth its current cost.

A benefit isn’t enough. The benefit has to be worth what you pay to get it.

Why Would Someone Not Convert at 72?

There are plenty of legitimate reasons.

Maybe the current tax cost is too high.

Maybe you don’t have enough outside liquidity.

Maybe the money is likely to go to charity.

Maybe the projected future tax benefit isn’t large enough.

Maybe paying a large conversion tax at 72 creates more stress than value.

Maybe the no-conversion strategy simply performs better under your assumptions.

Roth conversion isn’t a retirement requirement.

What If I Already Have Enough Roth Money?

That’s another reason not to look at the traditional IRA in isolation.

Suppose you have:

• $1 million traditional IRA
• $800,000 Roth IRA
• $700,000 taxable assets

You already have meaningful tax diversification.

That doesn’t mean another conversion is wrong.

But the need to create more Roth flexibility may be lower than it is for someone with $2 million traditional and almost nothing in Roth.

Your traditional IRA balance isn’t the whole balance sheet.

What If Almost Everything I Have Is Traditional?

Now the situation looks different.

Imagine:

• $2 million traditional IRA
• $100,000 Roth IRA
• $200,000 cash

You may be financially secure.

But almost all of your retirement wealth sits in one tax bucket.

That means future distributions may offer less tax flexibility than a more diversified account structure.

This can make Roth conversion scenarios worth testing.

Can a Roth Conversion at 72 Still Reduce Future RMDs?

Potentially.

Eligible traditional assets converted to Roth no longer remain in the traditional IRA relative to an otherwise identical no-conversion scenario.

That can result in a lower future traditional balance.

A lower traditional balance can potentially result in lower future RMDs.

But if you’re already subject to RMDs, the current year’s required distribution itself isn’t eligible for conversion.

You’re trying to change future traditional balances, not erase an RMD that’s already required.

What If I Need My RMD Anyway?

Then reducing future RMDs may be less valuable to you.

Suppose your retirement spending requires $100,000 from your IRA each year.

If you’re going to withdraw that money anyway, an RMD isn’t necessarily creating an unwanted distribution.

Compare that with someone whose pension and Social Security already cover every bill.

They may see an RMD as taxable income they didn’t need for spending.

The same RMD can feel completely different to two retirees.

Don’t Try to Solve an RMD Problem You Don’t Actually Have

This matters.

People hear:

“RMDs are bad.”

That’s too simplistic.

If you need the money, the required distribution may simply overlap with the withdrawal you were already planning to make.

If you don’t need it, then the lack of control can matter more.

Your spending plan determines whether an RMD is a problem before a calculator does.

What About Social Security at Age 72?

Social Security is already running for most people by this point.

A taxable Roth conversion can affect the federal calculation determining how much of your Social Security benefits is included in taxable income.

Under current federal rules, up to 85% of benefits can potentially be included in taxable income for some taxpayers.

That does not mean Social Security is taxed at an 85% tax rate.

It means up to 85% of the benefit may be included in taxable income, with the actual tax determined under applicable income-tax rules.

That distinction matters.

What About Medicare IRMAA?

At 72, Medicare is already part of your retirement budget.

A taxable Roth conversion can increase modified adjusted gross income used to determine Medicare income-related monthly adjustment amounts for some beneficiaries.

That can increase Part B and Part D costs.

And because Medicare generally uses tax-return information from an earlier year for these determinations, the effect may appear later.

The tax bill isn’t necessarily the only bill created by a conversion.

Should I Keep My Conversion Below an IRMAA Threshold?

That’s one scenario worth testing.

But don’t turn it into a commandment.

We can model:

Strategy A: Keep income below a relevant Medicare level.

Strategy B: Convert more and potentially incur additional Medicare costs.

Then compare the projected results.

Maybe Strategy A wins.

Maybe Strategy B creates enough projected long-term value to justify the additional cost.

Measure the tradeoff instead of assuming the answer.

What If I’m Married?

At 72, your spouse may be one of the biggest reasons to run the analysis.

Maybe you’re both 72.

Maybe your spouse is 68.

Maybe one of you has the majority of the traditional retirement assets.

Right now, the household might have:

• Two Social Security benefits
• A pension
• A joint tax return
• A large traditional IRA

Then one spouse dies.

That’s when the financial picture can change quickly.

The Surviving Spouse May Inherit the Account, Not the Same Tax Situation

This is the part people miss.

The surviving spouse may inherit a large traditional IRA.

But the household may lose one Social Security benefit.

A pension may decrease based on survivor provisions.

The tax filing situation can eventually change.

And one person is now managing the financial life that two people used to manage together.

The account can survive almost intact while the household around it changes dramatically.

“I Just Don’t Want My Spouse Dealing With a Mess”

That’s often more powerful than reducing taxes.

You’ve been married 30, 40, maybe 50 years.

You know which one of you handles the money.

If that’s you, there’s probably a thought you don’t say very often:

“What happens if I’m gone first?”

That’s not just an estate-planning question.

It’s a simplicity question.

A control question.

An independence question.

What If My Kids Will Inherit the IRA?

If you’re 72 and don’t need much of the account, this becomes increasingly relevant.

Current federal beneficiary rules can require many non-spouse beneficiaries to distribute inherited retirement accounts within a specified period, though exceptions and additional rules apply in certain circumstances.

Traditional IRA distributions can also create taxable income for beneficiaries.

That means the question isn’t just:

“How much will my children inherit?”

It’s also:

“What type of account will they inherit?”

What If My Children Are 45 or 50 and Making Good Money?

Now the timing may matter even more.

Your children may inherit retirement assets while they’re still working.

They may be executives.

Physicians.

Business owners.

Engineers.

Sales professionals.

They may already have significant taxable income.

Then inherited traditional IRA distributions can arrive on top of it.

You spent decades worrying about your tax bracket. Your heirs’ tax situation may deserve a look too.

Does That Mean I Should Convert Everything for My Kids?

No.

Your children aren’t the only people in the plan.

You’re still here.

Your spouse is still here.

Your retirement security comes first.

Don’t sacrifice liquidity or create an unattractive current tax cost just to manufacture a cleaner inheritance.

A legacy strategy that makes your own retirement weaker isn’t automatically a better legacy strategy.

What If Charity Will Receive Part of My IRA?

Now the analysis can change again.

Assets intended for charitable purposes can have different planning considerations from assets intended for individual beneficiaries.

So if a meaningful portion of your estate is going to charity, don’t blindly convert every traditional IRA dollar.

First determine what each pool of money is actually intended to do.

How Much Should I Convert at 72?

There isn’t one answer.

Suppose you have $1.5 million traditional.

Instead of saying:

“Convert $100,000.”

We could test:

• $0
• $25,000
• $50,000
• $75,000
• $100,000
• $150,000
• Different amounts in different years

Then see what each amount does to:

• Current taxes
• Medicare
• Social Security taxation
• Future RMDs
• Traditional balances
• Roth balances
• Liquidity
• Surviving-spouse outcomes
• Legacy outcomes

The amount should earn its way into the strategy.

Should I Convert the Entire IRA at 72?

That’s a scenario.

But it’s a big one.

Converting a large traditional IRA in one year can create substantial taxable income.

It can also affect other income-related costs.

Maybe a large conversion produces the strongest projected result.

But before doing it, I’d want it competing against partial conversions and no conversion.

The bigger the irreversible taxable event, the stronger the evidence I want before creating it.

What If I Don’t Have Enough Cash to Pay the Conversion Tax?

Then liquidity becomes a major constraint.

Imagine:

• $1.5 million traditional IRA
• $75,000 outside cash
• Social Security and pension covering most living expenses

You’re wealthy on paper.

But you don’t have a giant pool of accessible outside money.

A large conversion could force you to use assets you would rather keep available.

Having a large IRA doesn’t mean you have unlimited tax-paying cash.

Don’t Become Roth-Rich at 72 and Cash-Poor at 73

You still need liquidity.

Maybe for:

• Home repairs
• Healthcare
• Long-term care needs
• Travel
• A vehicle
• Helping children or grandchildren
• Emergencies

A conversion strategy can look fantastic 20 years into a projection while leaving you uncomfortable next year.

That matters.

Retirement isn’t lived at the end of a spreadsheet.

How Can the Conversion Tax Be Addressed?

There are several approaches worth evaluating.

Using Outside Cash or Taxable Assets

Outside assets may be used to address the tax generated by a conversion.

This can allow more of the selected conversion amount to remain inside the Roth.

But using outside assets reduces your available liquidity.

Using Retirement Assets or Withholding

Another approach may involve retirement assets or withholding.

This can reduce the amount ultimately reaching or remaining inside the Roth and can create additional tax considerations.

The transaction mechanics should be coordinated carefully.

Including Contractual Carrier Bonus Value in the Economic Comparison

When suitable, certain annuity contracts may provide contractual carrier bonus value.

That value can be included in the broader economic comparison of potential strategies.

In some modeled scenarios, contractual carrier bonus value may economically offset some or potentially all of the conversion-tax cost over the strategy period.

That may potentially reduce the need for additional personal out-of-pocket cash from an overall economic standpoint.

The carrier doesn’t assume your IRS tax liability.

A carrier bonus isn’t an IRS tax credit.

Your tax remains your responsibility.

Bonus terms, vesting, surrender provisions, liquidity restrictions, product charges, participation rates, caps, spreads, crediting methods, income features, guarantees, and other contractual provisions need to be evaluated before determining whether a particular product belongs in the strategy.

What If Tax Rates Are Lower in the Future?

Then paying tax now could be less attractive.

That’s why I don’t want your conversion decision based entirely on:

“Taxes are going up.”

Maybe they do.

Maybe future law changes in another direction.

Maybe your personal tax situation changes.

Maybe your spouse’s future tax situation changes.

We can model more than one assumption.

Your retirement shouldn’t need one tax prediction to come true for the strategy to work.

What If the Market Drops at 72?

A market decline can create an interesting conversion scenario.

Suppose an investment worth $200,000 falls to $150,000.

If you were already considering converting that asset, the lower current value may reduce the amount converted relative to its previous value.

If it later recovers inside the Roth, future qualified distributions may receive Roth tax treatment when applicable requirements are satisfied.

But recovery isn’t guaranteed.

And you’re 72.

Your risk tolerance, spending needs, and liquidity may matter more than they did 20 years ago.

A lower market value can create an opportunity without creating certainty.

The Biggest Mistake at 72 Is Thinking You Have to “Fix” Everything

You look at the IRA and think:

“I should’ve converted this years ago.”

Then you feel pressure to make up for lost time.

That’s dangerous.

You don’t need to fix 20 years of tax planning in one afternoon.

You need to make the strongest decision available from this point forward.

Past inaction doesn’t justify future overreaction.

The Psychology of Making a Big Financial Move at 72

At this age, you know something younger investors don’t.

Money is replaceable when you’re earning it.

It’s different when the earning years are mostly behind you.

You don’t want to chase.

You don’t want to gamble.

You don’t want to feel sold.

You want to know you’re not making a late-life mistake that can’t be easily repaired.

The Thought You Don’t Say Out Loud

It’s not:

“How can I maximize tax efficiency?”

It’s:

“What if we mess this up and regret it?”

Then another thought:

“I don’t want to ask my kids for help.”

You’ve been independent your whole adult life.

You paid the mortgage.

Raised the family.

Saved for retirement.

Handled the problems.

“We should be able to handle this ourselves.”

That’s why a strategy has to do more than look good mathematically.

It has to protect the independence the money was supposed to create.

Why Retirees at 72 Get Conflicting Roth Advice

Your CPA may look at the current tax bill and say:

“Why would you voluntarily recognize more income?”

Your financial professional may have another view.

Your estate attorney may focus on beneficiaries.

An insurance professional may show you a product.

Your neighbor may tell you what he did.

Your children may tell you not to worry about leaving them anything.

None of those perspectives automatically answers your question.

Your retirement needs its own comparison.

This Is Where Roth Blueprint Software Comes In

Instead of starting with a predetermined conversion amount, we can start with your actual retirement.

Your age.

Your IRA.

Your Social Security.

Your pension.

Your Medicare situation.

Your RMD status.

Your spending.

Your spouse.

Your heirs.

Your available cash.

Then our Roth Blueprint software can assess thousands of potential modeled scenarios.

What Can We Compare?

We can assess different:

• Annual Roth conversion amounts
• Conversion timelines
• One-time conversions
• Multi-year conversions
• Variable annual conversions
• Projected conversion taxes
• Traditional IRA balances
• Roth balances
• Projected RMDs
• Social Security income
• Pension income
• Potential Medicare IRMAA
• Retirement spending
• Retirement-income outcomes
• Personal liquidity
• Tax-funding approaches
• Surviving-spouse outcomes
• Beneficiary outcomes
• Legacy goals

Then we compare all of it against:

No Roth conversion.

Example: Make Five Strategies Compete at Age 72

Suppose you’re 72 with:

• $1.5 million traditional IRA
• $400,000 outside savings
• Social Security
• $40,000 pension
• Medicare
• $90,000 annual spending

We might compare:

Scenario A: No conversion.

Scenario B: $25,000 annual conversions.

Scenario C: $50,000 annual conversions.

Scenario D: $100,000 annual conversions.

Scenario E: Variable conversions based on taxes, RMDs, Medicare, liquidity, account values, and legacy goals.

Then we see what each strategy is projected to do.

Not which one sounds best.

Which one can prove itself.

What Does “Better” Mean at Age 72?

It may be different from what “better” meant at 50.

At 72, the strongest strategy may need to balance:

• Current taxes
• Future taxes
• Retirement income
• Traditional balances
• Roth balances
• RMDs
• Medicare
• Social Security taxation
• Liquidity
• Simplicity
• Surviving-spouse outcomes
• Legacy outcomes

The largest Roth balance doesn’t automatically win.

If getting there requires a tax bill or liquidity sacrifice that doesn’t produce enough projected benefit, the strategy hasn’t proven itself.

The Retirement Math Method™

This is why we use our Retirement Math Method™.

I don’t start with:

“You’re 72. You need to hurry up and convert.”

Pressure isn’t analysis.

I start with:

“What happens if we convert, and what happens if we don’t?”

Maybe the math says convert a meaningful amount.

Maybe it says use smaller conversions.

Maybe it says reduce future traditional balances for your spouse.

Maybe it says legacy planning makes a conversion more attractive.

Maybe it says preserve your liquidity.

Maybe it says leave a significant amount traditional.

Maybe it says don’t convert at all.

I don’t try to sell you on the strategy. I make the strategy prove itself with the math.

Let the math do the talking.

Frequently Asked Questions About Roth Conversions at Age 72

Can I do a Roth conversion at age 72?

Yes. Age 72 by itself doesn’t prevent a Roth conversion. Eligibility, current taxable income, RMD rules, Medicare, Social Security, liquidity, spouse planning, legacy goals, and the no-conversion alternative should be evaluated.

Is 72 too late for a Roth conversion?

Not necessarily. The decision should be based on whether the projected future benefits justify the current tax cost over your remaining retirement and legacy horizon.

Do RMDs start at age 72?

Not necessarily. Federal RMD starting ages have changed, and the applicable starting age can vary based on birth year and current law. Your specific required beginning date should be confirmed before building a conversion strategy.

Can I convert my RMD to Roth?

No. A required minimum distribution isn’t eligible for Roth conversion. If an RMD applies, it needs to be handled separately from additional eligible amounts considered for conversion.

Can I still do Roth conversions after RMDs start?

Potentially, yes. The RMD itself can’t be converted, but additional eligible traditional IRA assets may potentially be converted after applicable distribution requirements are addressed.

Can a Roth conversion at 72 affect Medicare?

Yes. Taxable conversion income can increase modified adjusted gross income used to determine Medicare income-related monthly adjustment amounts for some beneficiaries.

Can a Roth conversion affect Social Security taxes?

Taxable conversion income can affect the federal calculation determining how much of Social Security benefits is included in taxable income. Under current federal rules, up to 85% of benefits may be included in taxable income for some taxpayers, which isn’t the same as an 85% tax rate.

Should I convert my entire IRA at age 72?

Not automatically. A large one-year conversion can create substantial taxable income and affect other income-related costs. Partial conversions, liquidity needs, spouse outcomes, legacy goals, and no conversion should also be compared.

Does a Roth conversion make more sense if I don’t need my RMDs?

It may make Roth conversion planning more relevant because reducing future traditional balances could potentially reduce unwanted future distributions. The current tax cost still needs to be compared with the projected benefit.

Can Roth Blueprint model a conversion at age 72?

Our Roth Blueprint process can assess thousands of potential modeled scenarios involving conversion amounts, conversion timelines, projected taxes, traditional and Roth balances, RMDs, Social Security, Medicare considerations, retirement income, liquidity, surviving-spouse outcomes, beneficiary outcomes, legacy objectives, and no conversion.

You Don’t Need to Make Up for Lost Time

Maybe you should have looked at Roth conversions at 60.

Maybe 65 would have been a great year.

Maybe the years before Social Security would have created an attractive window.

They’re gone.

That isn’t today’s decision.

You don’t need to fix the past. You need to make the strongest decision available now.

Age 72 With $500,000 or More in Tax-Deferred Accounts? Let’s Run the Math.

If you’re around age 72 with $500,000, $1 million, $2 million, or more in traditional IRAs, 401(k)s, or other tax-deferred retirement assets, you may still have a meaningful Roth conversion decision in front of you.

When you meet with me, we can use our Roth Blueprint software and Retirement Math Method™ to assess thousands of potential modeled scenarios.

We can compare:

• No Roth conversion
• Smaller annual conversions
• Larger conversions
• Multi-year conversions
• Variable annual conversions
• Conversions before applicable RMDs
• Conversions after RMDs begin when eligible
• Different tax-bracket targets
• Different Medicare income scenarios
• Projected conversion taxes
• Projected traditional IRA balances
• Projected Roth balances
• Projected RMDs
• Social Security taxation
• Potential Medicare IRMAA
• Retirement income
• Personal liquidity
• Surviving-spouse outcomes
• Beneficiary outcomes
• Legacy outcomes
• Different approaches to addressing the conversion tax

Then we put the strategies side by side.

Maybe the math says convert.

Maybe it says convert less than you expected.

Maybe it says your spouse is the strongest reason to make a change.

Maybe it says the inheritance deserves more attention.

Maybe it says protect your liquidity.

Maybe it says leave the IRA alone.

That’s what you want to know before voluntarily creating a taxable event.

We don’t sell you a retirement strategy. We run the math and let you decide.

Let the math do the talking.

Schedule Your Roth Conversion Strategy Appointment

Explore More

• 
  Is It Too Late to Do a Roth Conversion at Age 70?
  
• 
  Can I Do a Roth Conversion After RMDs Have Started?
  
• 
  Should I Do a Roth Conversion If I Don’t Need My RMDs?
  

Important Disclosure

This article is for educational purposes only and isn’t intended as individualized tax, legal, investment, accounting, insurance, Medicare, Social Security, estate-planning, or retirement-planning advice. Roth conversions generally create taxable income to the extent converted amounts would otherwise be taxable. Qualified Roth IRA distributions are generally tax-free under current federal rules when applicable requirements are satisfied. Taxable conversion income may affect federal and state income taxes, marginal tax brackets, Medicare premiums, the federal taxation of Social Security benefits, estimated tax requirements, liquidity, beneficiary outcomes, and other parts of a financial plan. Required minimum distribution starting ages and rules vary based on birth year, account type, beneficiary status, and current law. Required minimum distributions aren’t eligible for Roth conversion. If an RMD applies for a year, applicable distribution requirements need to be handled separately from additional amounts that may be eligible for conversion. Roth conversions can potentially reduce future traditional retirement-account balances and future RMDs relative to an otherwise identical no-conversion scenario, but no specific tax, Medicare, RMD, retirement-income, surviving-spouse, beneficiary, or legacy outcome is guaranteed. Medicare income-related monthly adjustment amounts, income thresholds, premiums, Social Security rules, tax rules, retirement-account rules, and beneficiary rules can change. Roth Blueprint calculations and other projections are based on assumptions and information entered into the analysis and aren’t guarantees of future tax results, account values, investment performance, retirement income, Medicare premiums, RMD reductions, surviving-spouse outcomes, beneficiary outcomes, legacy results, or product performance. Insurance and annuity products may contain fees, charges, surrender periods, liquidity restrictions, eligibility requirements, bonus provisions, participation rates, caps, spreads, crediting methods, income features, guarantees, and other contractual terms. Guarantees are subject to the claims-paying ability of the issuing insurer. A carrier bonus isn’t an IRS tax credit and doesn’t transfer the client’s tax liability to an insurance company. Statements that contractual carrier bonus value may economically offset some or potentially all of a modeled conversion-tax cost aren’t statements that the tax disappears or that the carrier directly pays the client’s tax liability. Before executing a Roth conversion, taking an RMD, changing Medicare or Social Security decisions, making significant retirement-account withdrawals, purchasing an insurance or annuity product, or making other retirement decisions, consider working with qualified tax, legal, financial, investment, insurance, Medicare, estate-planning, and other appropriate professionals who can evaluate your individual circumstances.